63
intrusions. The widespread and variably deformed tonalitic, granodioritic,
and granitic basement rocks yield Archean U-Pb zircon ages ranging from
>3000 Ma to ca. 2575 Ma. Exposures of thickly bedded and upright-
folded, low-grade sandstone and stromatolitic carbonate of the passive
margin sequence are minimal and restricted to near the craton edge. An
extensive polydeformed and metamorphosed pelitic sequence with minor
carbonate, sandstone, and mafic volcanic rocks, rests unconformably on
the Archean basement. As such this sequence is part of an autochthonous
(not exotic) succession within the Coronation margin. Paleoproterozoic
intrusions were emplaced at ca. 1877, 1867, and 1858 to 1850 Ma. At ca.
1877 Ma and 1850 Ma there was coincident resetting of Archean U-Pb
systematics and regional metamorphism. The ca. 1877 Ma syn-
deformational intrusions are possible correlatives with the Hepburn
intrusive suite, but historical models indicate this suite was emplaced about
10 m.y. earlier during the ca. 1885 Ma Calderian orogeny. Plutonic phases
of ca. 1885 Ma are not identified within south-central Wopmay orogen.
The pattern of metamorphic isograds that developed around the ca. 1850
Ma Rodrigues granite, suggests the thermal aureole is related to
emplacement of this large pluton, potentially within a metamorphic core-
complex type environment. These younger intrusions are coeval with the
latest magmatism in the Great Bear magmatic zone to the west, and
intruded in a post-orogenic, potentially transtensional setting. Finally, a
Morel sill in the study area has yielded an 1868 Ma U-Pb zircon
crystallization age, 15 m.y. younger than its previously speculated age.
The new mapping and U-Pb zircon results, in conjunction with lithospheric
geophysical experiments, allow us to test previously proposed and new
hypotheses on the evolution of Wopmay orogen.
CONGLOMERATES AND CONGLOMERATES IN THE URANI-
FEROUS NORTHEAST THELON BASIN REGION, NUNAVUT:
GUIDES FOR UNRAVELLING >800 Ma OF SEQUENCE
STRATIGRAPHY AND METALLOGENY
Jefferson, C.W., Anand, A., Rainbird, R., Pehrsson, S., Davis, W.,
Peterson, T., Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street,
Ottawa, ON K1A 0E8; McEwan, B., Bethune, K., University of
Regina, 3737 Wascana Pkwy., Regina, SK S4S 0A2; Calhoun, L.,
White, J.C., Department of Earth Sciences, University of New
Brunswick, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3; and Patterson, J., Fellow,
Science College, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8
Some twenty conglomeratic markers in the northeastern Thelon Basin
region are distinguished by context, composition, texture and fabric. Many
overlie local to profound unconformities. They record pre- syn- and post-
depositional deformation, sequence boundaries, and mineralization.
Stratigraphy helps the GSC’s Geomapping for Energy and Minerals
(GEM) Program provide a framework for exploration. Of seven
Neoarchean assemblages, the first six constitute the Woodburn Lake group
and the seventh is a Rae craton scale 2.6Ga mafic to felsic
intrusive/extrusive suite. The Neoarchean is structurally intercalated (D
1
)
with early Paleoproterozoic platformal Ps1-3 (lower Amer and Ketyet
River groups). Ps4 is molasse, overlies D
1
nappes with profound
unconformity, and contains 1.9Ga detrital zircons and D
1
-style deformed
clasts. The 1.83 to <1.54Ga Dubawnt Supergroup comprises three rift-fill
groups: Baker Lake (5 subaerial volcanic and siliciclastic sequences),
Wharton (conglomerate, aeolian quartzarenite, bimodal volcanics and
coarse feldspathic alluvial sequences), and Barrensland (alluvial
conglomerate to sandstone sequences, topped by mafic potassic lavas and
marine dolostone). Some conglomerate highlights follow.
Polymict, quartz dominated conglomerate previously interpreted as
Neoarchean is intercalated in outcrop and drill core with the 2.7Ga
Woodburn Lake group around Meadowbank gold mine. We suggest it is
structurally intercalated basal Ps1, based on similarities with better
constrained <2.6Ga Ps1 to the northwest. This raises the questions of
whether pre-deformed cobbles of sulphidized BIF constrain the primary
age of gold mineralization and whether other conglomerates in the
Woodburn Lake group are truly Archean.
Conglomerate units help define the Ps1-Ps2 facing direction. Ps1
comprises basal schist ± basal conglomerate, quartzarenite, ± upper
conglomerate. Ps2 is characterized by graphitic schist, intercalated with
three discontinuous components that, where present, are always in order:
impure sandstone - dolostone - basalt. Highly attenuated isoclinal D
1
folds
defined by such facing directions and the flat synforms of cuspate-lobate
D
2
explain the 400-1000m widths of Ps1 map units, whose pre-D
1
thicknesses were only 100-200m.
Conglomerate characteristics and angular unconformities around the
margins of northeastern Thelon Basin have allowed us to recognize aeolian
sandstone as Wharton, not Barrensland group. Wharton conglomerate is
highly feldspathic with dominantly quartz pebble framework, whereas
overlying Wharton is aeolian quartzarenite. Conversely, basal Barrensland
conglomerate is highly polymict (including Wharton clasts) in a quartzose
matrix whereas overlying Barrensland is clay-altered fluvial arkose.
Unconformity-associated uranium deposits may be discovered below the
Barrensland, and within or below the Wharton groups.
CAN TARGETING CRITERIA FROM ATHABASCA BASIN BE
ADAPTED TO URANIUM EXPLORATION IN THELON AND
OTHER NORTHERN PALEOPROTEROZOIC BASINS? A
PROGRESS REPORT
Jefferson, C.W., cjeffers@nrcan.gc.ca, Chorlton, L., Pehrsson, S.,
Peterson, T., Davis, W., Potter, E., Gandhi, S., Bleeker, W., Keating,
P., Fortin, R., Buckle, J., Miles, W., Rainbird, R., LeCheminant, A.,
Paulen, R., McClenaghan, B., Hillary, B., Geological Survey of
Canada, 601 Booth St., Ottawa, ON K1A 0E8; Quirt, D.,
Wollenberg, P., AREVA; Wheatley, K. Forum; Riegler, T., U of
Poitiers; Ramaekers, P., MF Resources., Tschirhart, V., Tschirhart,
P., Morris, W., McMaster U; Scott, J.M.J., Cousens, B., Carleton U;
McEwan, B., Bethune, K., Riemer, W., U of Regina; Calhoun, L.,
White, J.C., MacIsaac, D., Leblon, B., Lentz, D., LaRocque, A.,
Shelat, Y., UNB; Patterson, J., Concordia U; Bridge, N., Banerjee,
UWO; Sharpe, R., Fayek, M., U of M; Robinson, S., Layton-
Matthews, D., Queen's U; Enright, A. and Stieber, C., U of Ottawa
This question has driven investigations of northern Canadian basins since
Rabbit Lake was discovered in 1968, and is the guiding hypothesis for
GEM’s Northern Uranium for Canada Project. Discovery of Kiggavik in
1977 and Cameco’s recent exploration success just west of there
demonstrate that the answer is YES for the Thelon Basin region, yet this
and the other northern basins remain under-explored. We contribute
improved geoscience knowledge of areas around Thelon, Angikuni and
Hornby Bay basins to further evaluate this hypothesis. Speculative
interpretations below do not necessarily represent the views of co-authors
or corporations who contributed knowledge.
Known uranium resources near Thelon Basin are basement-hosted
and occur beyond present sandstone cover. Our studies focus on
integrating regional compilations with detailed mapping, and geological,
geophysical and drift prospecting models, while refining Thelon Basin
stratigraphy. Basement to Thelon basin differs from the Paleoproterozoic
fold-thrust belts beneath Athabasca Basin: six Neoarchean sequences of
ultramafic to felsic volcanic and sedimentary rocks are structurally
intercalated with thin sequences of Paleoproterozoic platformal
siliciclastics, minor dolostone and continental tholeiitic basalt. Graphitic
metapelite is fertile beneath Athabasca Basin but barren in the few drill
intersections below Thelon Basin. Disseminated cigar-shaped sandstone
uranium deposits in Thelon’s basement differ contextually from uranium
and copper occurrences in the rift component of Athabasca’s basement. In
Thelon’s Kiggavik area, Neoarchean metagreywacke is the preferred
uranium host, especially where intruded by high-level 1.75 Ga granite.
Intersecting reactivated faults localizing illite, chlorite and hematite
alteration around uranium deposits are key in both basins, although details
of mineralogy and zoning differ. Both basins developed intracontinentally
by reactivated faulting and were filled by big rivers, but have different
sequence stratigraphy, sandstone composition, diagenetic and
hydrothermal alteration events. Exploration success depends on
understanding each basin’s parameters and adapting to the similarities and
differences.
We assess other “types” of uranium deposits with the unconformity
paradigm and reinterpret Lac Cinquante and Port Radium veins in circum-
Angikuni (southern Baker Lake Basin) and Hornby Bay Basin areas
respectively as exhumed unconformity deposits with greater vistas for
exploration. We consolidate discovery of Dessert Lake Basin as correlative